Court Holds Applicant Alleged Sufficient Harm to Proceed with FCRA Action Against Employer
Tags : FCRA Compliance
The Court of Appeals for the Western District of Missouri reversed a trial court's granting of summary judgement in part, finding that one of the plaintiffs did state sufficient injuries caused by an employer's "procedural" FCRA violation to have standing.
In Courtright, et al. v. O'Reilly Automotive, three applicants filed suit asserting adverse action claims against O'Reilly Automotive. The plaintiffs alleged that O'Reilly violated FCRA requirements by failing to provide the applicants with their background check reports before taking adverse employment actions.
After the initial trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the employer, the applicants appealed. The Missouri Court of Appeals found that two of the three applicants could not allege sufficient injuries to establish that the employer's procedural violation of the FCRA's pre-adverse action requirements was the cause of their alleged harm. However, it the court concluded that the third applicant, Anthony Bradley, did allege sufficient harm caused by the procedural violation to have standing.
Bradley demonstrated that he was not provided the results of his background check before adverse action was taken. Bradley was unable to dispute his report until he requested a background report from O'Reilly's third party vendor. Once he disputed the information in the report, the background check vendor corrected the incorrect information and provided the corrected report to O'Reilly. The new report showed that the applicant had not been convicted and sentenced for the previously reported crime, as the original report claimed.
The Court of Appeals concluded that if O'Reilly had furnished the report to Bradley before taking final adverse action, he would have had the chance to resolve the error.
Posted: July 23, 2020
All Rights Reserved © 2020 Certiphi Screening, Inc.
This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.
What Our Clients Are Saying
Everyone I have contacted at Certiphi has been a complete pleasure to work with. The Certiphi customer service rivals every other customer service I come in contact with. Everyone is always so professional, yet super nice! Thanks for all you do and keep up the amazing work and impeccable service that you provide!!!
Thank you so much! You have such an incredible reputation within our office; I think we would all say your customer service levels are continually at about 125%!
The response time has been very quick. The turnaround times are great. I love your systems and that I can go in and look at the process as its going.
It’s such a great customer service that you provide and I’m happy to tell that to anyone.
Working with Certiphi has been such a pleasure. Certiphi has taught me so much, not just about backgrounds but also the meaning of great business.
We flew through our NCQA licensure review. We very much appreciate Certiphi's help in earning a 100% score for the files!