Plaintiff in FCRA Case Granted Article III Standing by Federal Court
Tags : FCRA Compliance
A decision rendered by the Middle District Court of North Carolina determined that a plaintiff maintained standing to bring his FCRA claims to federal court
In Derrick v. Full House Mktg., the plaintiff applied for employment in March of 2019 with defendant Full House Marketing, an employment agency. Plaintiff was classified as ineligible for employment based on the contents of a consumer report generated by Resolve Partners, LLC ("Resolve"), a consumer reporting agency. Shortly thereafter, Resolve sent Plaintiff a pre-adverse action letter as required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA); however, the letter was not accompanied by a copy of the consumer report. Since Plaintiff never received a copy, he was unaware that it contained inaccurately reported information involving certain felonies and misdemeanors. He only learned of the contents of the report five weeks later after the position had been filled.
Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that Defendant violated the FCRA by failing to provide him a copy of the consumer report prior to taking adverse action. As part of his claim, Plaintiff also alleged that he suffered actual harm as a result of the violation in the form of a lost employment opportunity, wage loss and emotional distress. Defendant argued that Plaintiff "failed to articulate any injury" because an informational injury does not suffice for Article III standing. Parties seeking to sue in federal court are required to establish Article III standing, which requires that the plaintiff demonstrate: (1) an injury in fact; (2) that the injury was caused by defendant's conduct; and (3) that the injury can likely be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.
The Supreme Court has held that "[o]nly plaintiffs concretely harmed by a defendant's statutory violation have Article III standing to seek damages against that private defendant in federal court." (See Spokeo, Inv. V. Robins, 156 S. Ct. 1540 (2016)). The Court further held that "Article III standing requires a concrete injury even in the context of a statutory violation" and it was not the case that "a plaintiff automatically satisfies the injury-in-fact requirement whenever a statute grants a person a statutory right and purports to authorize that person to sue to vindicate that right."
Here, the court found that Defendant's failure to supply Plaintiff with a copy of his report was material, as it ultimately prevented him from being hired. As such, the court denied Defendant's motion and held that Plaintiff had sufficiently alleged that a concrete and particularized injury in fact was suffered, meeting the requirements for Article III standing.
Employers are encouraged to review internal workflows for issuing pre-adverse and adverse action letters as well as copies of consumers' reports to ensure compliance with FCRA.
Posted: March 22, 2022
All Rights Reserved © 2022 Certiphi Screening, Inc.
This document and/or presentation is provided as a service to our customers. Its contents are designed solely for informational purposes, and should not be inferred or understood as legal advice or binding case law, nor shared with any third parties. Persons in need of legal assistance should seek the advice of competent legal counsel. Although care has been taken in preparation of these materials, we cannot guarantee the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information contained within it. Anyone using this information does so at his or her own risk.
Everyone I have contacted at Certiphi has been a complete pleasure to work with. The Certiphi customer service rivals every other customer service I come in contact with. Everyone is always so professional, yet super nice! Thanks for all you do and keep up the amazing work and impeccable service that you provide!!!
Thank you so much! You have such an incredible reputation within our office; I think we would all say your customer service levels are continually at about 125%!
The response time has been very quick. The turnaround times are great. I love your systems and that I can go in and look at the process as its going.
It’s such a great customer service that you provide and I’m happy to tell that to anyone.
Working with Certiphi has been such a pleasure. Certiphi has taught me so much, not just about backgrounds but also the meaning of great business.
We flew through our NCQA licensure review. We very much appreciate Certiphi's help in earning a 100% score for the files!